sorry but i don't understand your question.............[but what's not going easier?]Good windows, bravo! Fluent, fast, good fps! But on video conversion, but what's not going easier?
I deal with video conversions. Compared to a normal windows, there is no improvement in fps with handbrake, compared to a normal windowssorry but i don't understand your question.............[but what's not going easier?]
Without knowing your specific hardware and so speaking in general, some applications like video compression are more hardware-dependent than software-dependent as they dont use all of the PCs hardware. Video encoders use the GPU to compress the video faster (or at least I hope you use your GPU or you are losing a LOT of speed) and so the version of windows won't affect the speed by a significant margin if any at all.I deal with video conversions. Compared to a normal windows, there is no improvement in fps with handbrake, compared to a normal windows
Using even RTX + Dvd fab, with gpu, the loss to make the file small + quality, is highWithout knowing your specific hardware and so speaking in general, some applications like video compression are more hardware-dependent than software-dependent as they dont use all of the PCs hardware. Video encoders use the GPU to compress the video faster (or at least I hope you use your GPU or you are losing a LOT of speed) and so the version of windows won't affect the speed by a significant margin if any at all.
Even without a GPU video compression, video encoding is a linear process. Read frame-->Encode---->Write frame which windows wont affect a lot.
Quality depends on parameters set to the encoder mostly, but that is irrelevant to the point I was trying to make.Using even RTX + Dvd fab, with gpu, the loss to make the file small + quality, is high
The processor remains the best choice, it produces the best quality and small file. But I have the impression that windows blocks the power of the processors
I own an AMD 3950x with MSI needles x570
Are you talking about FFMPEG, the video converter with the reverse command?Quality depends on parameters set to the encoder mostly, but that is irrelevant to the point I was trying to make.
Video encoding is not as much affected by the OS cause it's rare to use the full CPU potential by design. You can see that in the manual of handbrake that it scales up to 6 cores and diminishing returns apply after that.
Now if we consider that a user has SMT on, probably make that 3 physical cores which means your system doesn't even come close on using its full resources. It's not a windows problem and that's why you don't notice any difference.
I have a 3970x and I find that there are 2 ways to approach this. Either run multiple instances of the encoder in parallel (like do 4 videos concurrently) to utilize all cores or switch to a video encoder that scales with multicore CPUs like FFmpeg. Google has plenty of info on the subject.
Back to the point, you don't notice a difference between this version of windows compared to others because video encoding doesn't utilize your system fully in any scenario. Nothing to do with this specific build.