I serious doubt it.. We are windows and software forum. Not anthing to do with music. Contact
@ButchyBear for help on this ..you might get lucky..
RuZZZ said:
"This question is for every Windows OS Moderator . Is there a possibility to make an Win OS that is build for music producers where the only importance is: speed. It has NO internet/update/defender/remote software/network etc etc. Everything out... I just want to install my DAW software and VST plugins and that's it. If I need to download anything, or post something on Soudcloud or so....I have to do this on my other pc, because on this OS it totally impossible.
This OS will run as fast as hell because it is only build for producing.. (and maybe some Photoshop (without Adobe Cloud ofcourse) .... SO.... CAN THIS BE DONE? Really hope so."
RuZZZ,
The quick answer is no. Use LINUX, get better hardware, or... Read the following.
OK, first I need to know what you mean by music computer. You mentioned producer build. To tell you the truth, speed in producing can be improved by other means. The Windows version you use has so little to do with the speed needed for production hardly makes a difference. Windows 7 is better for some things as it doesn't try to force Windows drivers down your throat. What program are you using to produce your music It is music you created where you have all the original tracks? Are you remixing from stem tracks? Is it music that was mostly recorded in a linear fashion or using loops? The DAW you use will make a huge difference. If you are producing high-track count songs, you will need lots of RAM, and lots of cores. You will likely need internet access if you are using modern music software. You should be using an SSD for your OS and music software. If you have limited resources, by that I mean a computer that is not very powerful, You are going to be limited as far as track counts go and how you produce. Digital effects can be applied to tracks, then use the resulting track to mix with as opposed to trying to have your computer apply all effects in real-time. It is not a simple question to answer. I would forget about Windows and focus on programs used, using accelerators for plug-ins like Universal Audio that used SHARK chips to process. If you are a professional and have a large budget, ProTools has tons of outboard processing boxes, PM me with your setup and include programs you are using, I need to know track counts, number of cores, not threads, real cores. Any PC except Opteron G-34 socket ones will double core count. Intel came up with it, all is it is a parking space for data just outside the computing core that slides in when the core isn't being used, I need to know TRUE CORE COUNT and track numbers and what kind of effects you are applying and how they are being applied. Are you using 64-bit effects or 32-bit? I assume you are working with .WAV files. Do not process them using a higher sample rate than 96 kHz and 32 bit. 48 kHz and 24 bit are more than enough for your final format, if you plan on putting music on a CD, 41.1kHz and 16-bit is ok, because that is all a CD can use, a DVD can have up to 96kHz/32-bit or even be converted to bitstream for the final copy. Converting to bit-stream will make the recording sound better than any PWM format. It's Physics and it's true, you can make a recording sound better just by converting the format to bit-stream, or one bit and 2.8224 MHz (or a multiple of it) sample rate. this is the ONLY case I know of though. Beware of LPCM encoding for bit-stream. Please PM me and I can help. I need all programs used and all hardware used, also music sources.
~BB
so it's a completely legal Windows version.
