Torrent PassMark PerfomanceTest v10.1 Build 1004 Multilingual + Fix ***Team-OS***

[Baronstragen]

PassMark PerformanceTest 10.1 Build 1004 Multilingual

PassMark PerformanceTest is software that can be used to measure the overall performance of a PC relative to other computers. The software includes twenty-seven standardized tests in seven groups, plus five more for user tests. Among the standard tests are processor tests, 2D and 3D graphics, disk drives, memory, CD / DVD drives and many other computer components.

The results can be exported to HTML, GIF, BMP format or copied to Microsoft Word. Comprehensive performance test of the PerformanceTest system from PassMark Software can be characterized by a large set of test modules and good comparative results visualization, interestingly, Intel provides it with proprietary software for its own production motherboards.

The software includes twenty-seven standardized tests in seven groups, plus five more for specific tests. Among the standard tests are processor tests, 2D and 3D graphics, disk drives, memory, CD / DVD drives and many other computer components. The program interface allows comparison with the test results of other systems, six of which are recorded in the program itself, and the rest can be imported by the user.

The program also allows you to export the results as HTML reports presented in tabular form, and exporting to TXT files is also possible. In addition to standardized test results, PassMark PerformanceTest displays the final 7 results and the overall test result (“PassMark Rating”).

The developer is proud that the test passing time is calculated with an accuracy of 1 million seconds. Benchmark results are presented in simple bar chart form, so you don’t have to spend hours studying the numbers and summarizing yourself. The totals can be used to determine how well your computer is performing compared to other computer systems.

Features of PassMark PerformanceTest:

Find out if your PC is working at the level it should be
Comparison of the performance of your computer against the performance of machines with similar and / or cooler configurations
Independent and objective measurements will help you make informed purchasing decisions
Uses the latest tests to create your own benchmark script
CPU Testing Mathematical Operations: Compression, Encryption, MMX / SSE, 3DNow! etc.
Testing 2D graphics: drawing / painting, bitmaps / bitmaps / bitmaps, fonts, text and graphical user interface elements
Testing 3D graphics: DirectX 8.1, DirectX 9 3D graphics levels and animation
Test disk: read, write, and search files on disk
Memory testing: allocation and access to memory speed and performance evaluation
Testing CDs and DVDs: check the speed of the CD / DVD drivers.
Improved custom test (available only in registered version)
Better test for disks
better test for CD / DVD
Improved 3D graphics test
Enhanced Network Test (for Ethernet, Internet and Wireless)
improved tests for memory
Improved multiprogramming job test

Why do results from PerformanceTest V10 differ from previous releases?
With the introduction of PerformanceTest V10 (March 2020) a number of changes were made to the benchmark algorithms. The motivation for the changes were

We wanted to start using new CPU instructions only available in modern CPUs (e.g. AVX512 & FMA). But it is important to note that the AVX512 part of the benchmark is pretty small. It is only a portion of the Extended Instructions Test. Which is one of eight tests. If AVX512 isn't available then FMA instructions are still used (if available). While the performance difference between SSE instructions (in very old CPUs) and AVX512 is a fairly dramatic. The difference between FMA and AVX512 is less so. AVX512 isn't used at all in the single threaded test.
Wanting to use a more up to date compiler (Visual Studio 2019 instead of 2013) which also brings some code optimization, better profiling and ease of development.
Have better support for out of order execution, which is a feature newer CPUs do a better job at, compared to old CPUs.
Updated the 3rd party libraries we use for some of the CPU tests (including more modern versions of GZip, Crypto++ and Bullet Physics).
Fixed up a bunch of bugs that hurt performance (like some variable alignment issues and previously poorly chosen compiler optimization flags).
Completely rewrote some of the CPU tests. e.g. removed the unpopular TwoFish encryption code and replaced it with the more common Elliptic curve encryption.
Improving the algorithms to push more data through the CPU, which also results in more load on the cache and memory subsystem. So older CPUs, those with inadequate cache or memory bandwidth are expected not to perform so well with PT10.
We wanted to build in support for comparing x86 PC CPU benchmarks to ARM and iOS systems
For the 2D tests we started to make use of new Win10 built in features, that were not available in Win7 (and support for Vista was terminated). These include the rendering of SVG image files and PDF files. This hurts Win7, but adds more relevancy to the tests as displaying SVGs on web pages and PDF files are common tasks.
Also for the 2D tests we started to make more use of DirectX (DX11) to render graphics. Performance is better than programming through GDI+ but it takes more coding effort.
We wanted to place more load on the video card for 2D and 3D, so screen resolution was increased on many of the tests. 1080p is now the expected minimum to run the tests.
We added a new 4KQD1 disk test (using 4K block size with a queue depth of 1) as this has become a defacto industry standard over the last 5 years
We had been using using mostly the same benchmark code since 2012, so after 8 years the hardware was starting to move on and it was time for a update to maintain long term relevance and continue to reflect the performance of modern real world applications.
So the new individual PT10 results can't at least on the surface be compared to the PT9 results. They are really different. Probably the biggest algorithm overhaul we have made in 20 years of development. BUT for the CPUMark value, which is a combination result derived from the results of all the individual tests, we scaled it back to PT9 levels. So the PT10 CPUMark is somewhat comparable to the PT9 CPUMark. More so for CPUs from the same era, not so much for old vs new CPUs.

The net effect of these changes on the CPU results is to reward CPUs which have modern instruction sets, better IPC and faster memory buses. So in PerformanceTest V10 there is a larger gap between modern and old CPUs, as compared to V9. i.e Old CPUs suddenly look worse in PT10.

Windows 10/8.1/8/7 32 and 64 bit

Download and Unzip. Read the teamOS.txt file.

You must be registered for see links

​

 

[Gabby01]

@Baronstragen, thanks for this update
already seeding for others...

 

[kojoe]

Thanks for the updated version. ^)^

 

[ChaKeShi]

Thank a lots @Baronstragen for update & Sharing ...

 

[phil22261]

thank you for this post

 

[carlcall]

Many thanks for the upload @Baronstragen

 

[rl473]

Very nice and handy tool , thanks for sharing this version.

 

[th3g3ntl3m4n]

Thank you very many !!

 

[yscomputer]

Thanks for sharing. Thank you !